Remember Bonanza? Family matters!

Posted on 27 November, 2016 by Patrick Estebe in General Security

111 bonanza 2All baby boomers and their parents remember the TV series Bonanza.   When I was a kid, the theme song had everyone rushing into the living room as my dad was a great fan of the show himself.   No one at the time ever commented on the Cartwright kids still living with their father.  Quite the opposite, it was the normal way of life in most ranches and farms.   Often there were three generations living together on the same property and sometimes up to five generations.  In those days, we used to take care of our own.  I clearly remember my father asking us if he could count on us when he became too old to stand his ground, dreaming that, like the Cartwrights, the Estebes would stand together, come hell or high water.

Now, decades of social engineering have wreaked havoc on the fundamental concept of family.    This nonsense has the millennials shamed into “having to” go on their own, publicly mocked by political candidates as cave dwellers.   What can be more stupid and wrong than breaking the family bonds?  I for one do not mind if any or all of my kids are “within the perimeter”.  In fact, I certainly prefer it that way, cool to know that, if trouble knocks at the door, the entire tribe will at once go to battle stations.  Trouble can be a “mere” hurricane, and instead of worrying about how every one is doing, is it not better to have everyone together getting organized for lack of power as well as lack of order…

Now there are many valid reasons for men and women to leave the family ranch/castle/farm/house and certainly no one should be hindered from following his own path or with his/her beloved to “find their own tree” (1).   However, if the only reason to go away is social pressure, or because people do not want to watch the same channel or listen to the same music, there is a much deeper problem, and that problem will not be solved by going away.

Mentors have become an endangered species.  The Greeks well understood the importance of family and brotherhood.  They were true masters at raising young people to become fantastic men and women who, at some point, would save the very concept of democracy.  Aside from education from parents and the clan, they had refined a fantastic educational concept: the mentor.  Often a grandfather, an uncle or a friend of the parents, the mentor was instrumental in keeping the youth on the right track and giving them their bearings.  The mentor might also arbitrate when family conflicts arose, thereby keeping the family together.  Furthermore, should the family be decimated, the mentor would look after the surviving members.  The absence of the mentor in our diminished nuclear families means that, when family conflict arises, the only option for the youth is to take off.  This then puts him on his own, with his debts and his mortgage, without support from his family, and, most importantly, without a safe haven.

The cost of breaking up the family is staggering; yet we still have politicians mocking the few young people who choose to live with their parents or otherwise keep the family unit together.

I have used the following Rudyard Kipling quote before in this blog, but it is appropriate to refer to it again, particularly since the 4th verse is quite telling about the security implications:

 

Now this is the Law of the Jungle –111 wolf pack order
as old and as true as the sky;
And the Wolf that shall keep it may prosper,
but the Wolf that shall break it must die.

 

As the creeper that girdles the tree-trunk
the Law runneth forward and back –
For the strength of the Pack is the Wolf,
and the strength of the Wolf is the Pack.

 

 

 

We are predators, but we should also keep in mind that we are pack predators.  Consider the number of youth who, without a functioning family, join gangs, whether for crime or the pursuit of nefarious causes.  Perhaps surprisingly however, this is not the central issue.  Isolation is mere collateral damage for economic social engineering that just wants to make learned helplessness endemic so it can be exploited.

 

Several experts I have met have refused to admit that PTSD would also be less of an issue if we had strong families veterans could return to, knowing that there they would find a number of past veterans who would definitely understand and guide them.  I do not have a PhD in Psychology so I shall not argue the issues.  However, I shall rest my case by pointing out that every association taking care of veterans strives to ensure that they find a supportive family within this association.  Also, consider the incidence of PTSD after World War I where combat conditions were far worse but where family structures were far stronger.

For your security, it is time to recognize the value of a strong family living together.   Where is your safe haven?

  1. 1934 movie: “The Count of Monte Cristo” by Rowland V. Lee adaptation of the eponymous novel by Alexander Dumas.

6 Comments

  1. Another very pertinent reminder of the failings of our society. We should all be family first, including also the care of our elderly relatives. With life expectancy ever increasing and a lack of social care grows.

    Bravo Captain. Food for thought as always.

  2. As there are many arguments for the family unit you widely apply modern day security needs to the same.. I think of my own father, now 85 living alone but fortunately near a brother and his daughter and your point is living proof in that case of the need for family cohesiveness…

    je suis d’accord et bien fait!

    R.

  3. Very instructive and relevant. it is true that the society has been engineered in a way to isolate each individual which make the entire system easier to control. Remember the actual system promote production-consumption, not the family. The faster the kids get into the mortgage, work, loan, credit card’s scheme the better it is for the system and their politician.

  4. Great commentary on what is happening today! Am old enough to remember when 3 generations lived on a farm. Grandparents had the time to look after the children, advise them, and tell the children about their family history. No doubt the family is stronger as a unit.

  5. What a great sentiment on the sentiment of family. I will take umbrage with the cave dweller comment though. Since words matter a lot, “cave dweller” would have the connotation of an under achieving, underwear wearing, video game addict, “Failure To Launch” type of dude, not one of the Cartwright’s. For what its worth we need more hurricanes and other events to wake us up to the importance of the God-honoring institution called the family. Thanks Patrick.

  6. Family, Country, Society, Humanity, Truth, Freedom, Love, God. What do these have in common? They all are things that require us to think about and serve a cause greater than ourselves and the world no longer has people that do that. (Mostly) The global mindset is self first and then everything else gets the scraps of attention, and even love. selfishness is the corruption of every system the world over. And it is the tool by which the family unit has been shattered as have so many other aspects of life. Even the idea of masculinity has been demonized. So if a person has lost the concept of loyalty and commitment to family how on earth would it be possible for that person to have a sense of country? or more? this is the cancer of our time. we have been divided and soon to be conquered. Not today or tomorrow but soon. Take a look at the world. Ask yourself, who are the few that are united in a cause that is greater than themselves? who are willing to truly sacrifice themselves for a greater good?

Pingbacks

Leave a Reply to Eric Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


+ 4 = six

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>